Looking for a Way Forward on Redistricting Reform

David Thornburgh and Blake Esselstyn lead one session exploring new mapping technologies. Participants were then able to use the technologies to develop their own maps (see below).
David Thornburgh and Blake Esselstyn lead one session exploring new mapping technologies. Participants were then able to use the technologies to develop their own maps (see below).

More than 300 national experts and advocates for redistricting and gerrymandering reform gathered at Duke’s Penn Pavilion Jan. 25-26 to move forward toward a bipartisan consensus on redistricting.

Hosted by POLIS: Duke University’s Center for Political Leadership, Innovation, and Service, the two-day Reason, Reform, & Redistricting Conference produced discussions on the latest developments and ideas in the national conversation about redistricting.  The Sanford School of Public Policy and Common Cause co-sponsored the event.

Panel discussions included:

  • A “state of the nation” that covered recent national developments in redistricting
  • An overview of pending and upcoming litigation from legal experts
  • A discussion on the implications of the upcoming 2020 census
  • A deep look at redistricting through a racial equity lens
  • A conversation on advocacy and organizing for reform in North Carolina
  • A debrief on lessons learned from recent reform victories in other states
  • An update on building and using quantitative gerrymandering metrics and evidence
  • A deliberation on how to craft a winning argument around the First Amendment
  • A conversation about collecting and using public input for redistricting reform

One highlight was remarks from Congressman David Price (D-NC).  He noted the conference’s backdrop of the federal government shutdown as a byproduct, in part, of redistricting and gerrymandering.  He lamented the effect of gerrymandering on the polarization of our politics.  “Far too many representatives in Congress today only have to be concerned with a challenge in their party’s primary,” he said.

participants at our Reason, Reform & Redistricting got the chance to experience the latest mapping technology first hand and workshop strategies that could work in their communities.
Other speakers included former UNC System President and Sanford Distinguished Fellow Tom Ross; Duke Mathematics Department Chair Jonathan Mattingly; Common Cause President Karen Hobart-Flynn; and Wake Forest Mayor Vivian Jones.

Ross noted in the conference’s opening session that “If democracy is something that we care about, then this is the issue of our time.”

He and others also hinted that windows of opportunity could be opening for redistricting reform, as evidenced by recent reform victories in places like Michigan, Utah, and Missouri. Many speakers explored North Carolina’s efforts to affect change through both the General Assembly and the courts.

The legal challenges to partisan gerrymandering were also a prominent topic of discussion. Counsel for Common Cause, representatives from the League of Women Voters, and a number of experts providing testimony in the ongoing cases spoke at length about constitutional challenges to the problematic role that politics plays in redistricting. Attendees were able to hear about different legal approaches as well as understand the data and research behind some of the arguments that will be presented before the Supreme Court later this year.

The conference concluded with a call to action from Fritz Mayer.  “There is nothing democratic about disenfranchisement,” Mayer said.  “We must continue to fight for political practices that celebrate the varied opinions of our citizenry, because those opinions cannot come to the fore when buried in gerrymandered districts that no longer heed their calls.”