News by Topic

Click on a topic below to see the latest headline

Customize "My Headlines" by Topic

Choose the topics of most interest to you to follow under "My Headlines".

Subscribe

Sign up for newsletters, news feeds, social media and other news sources.

Resources for News Media

Are you a reporter working on a story? Here's where you find help from Duke.

Better Training Appears to Reduce Student Cheating

Better Training Appears to Reduce Student Cheating

But ethical challenges remain, a new survey of Duke undergraduates finds

print |

Durham, NC - In 2005, Duke University started requiring all freshmen to take an online tutorial about plagiarism. Today, 40 percent fewer students report plagiarizing than when the requirement was put in place.

Similarly, a third fewer Duke students now fabricate or falsify lab data and bibliographies than in 2005, in part because their mandatory Writing 20 courses now include instruction about proper citations, bibliographies and other academic expectations.

However, newly released findings from a 2011 survey of 2,000 Duke undergraduates also find many struggling to balance their personal work with group collaborations, as team-based projects become more common in their Duke classrooms.

The new survey, a follow-up to and extension of surveys conducted in 1995, 2000 and 2005, was administered jointly by the Academic Integrity Council and the Kenan Institute for Ethics. It is available online. Past reports are on the council's website.

Kaveh Danesh, a Duke Student Government member who served on the council, hopes the findings will spur broader campus discussion of ethical issues. "The report gives us a valuable opportunity to reflect on the role of ethics inside and outside of the classroom and, in particular, to think about how one's values in each of these two spheres are part of the same whole," Danesh said.

Lee Baker, dean of academic affairs of Trinity College and another council member, said the results ring true. He noted how the focus in lab courses has shifted from replicating experiments and finding predetermined right answers to pursuing more creative explorations.

"Anyone can figure out what the results of a lot of these standard lab exercises should be; you can just eyeball the number of moles and fill in your notebook accordingly," Baker said. "These new assignments require a lot more critical thinking and eliminate the possibility of fabrication."

For the first time, the 2011 survey also asked students questions about their behavior outside the classroom, such as about romantic relationships and use of alcohol. Fewer than half reported knowingly disclosing information imparted in confidence (40 percent); faking an illness (35 percent) or covering up for a slacker on a group project (34 percent). Many students said they feel dishonesty in academics spills over into other areas of life, with one saying she wouldn't be surprised if Bernie Madoff "wasn't the most ethical student."

When asked to rank 20 behaviors on a 1-9 scale (1 being perfectly unethical, 9 perfectly ethical), the students seemed to differentiate between perceived "victimless" behaviors and behaviors affecting others. Cheating on a romantic partner while in an exclusive relationship was rated the most unethical, with driving under the influence a close second. Covering up for a slacker on a group project or pirating music from the Internet ranked last and were seen in almost neutral terms, although they did fall on the unethical end of the spectrum.

On the whole, the Duke students believed their peers to be acting more unethically than they reported themselves to be acting, both inside and outside the classroom. For example, students estimated twice as many students fabricate lab data as those reporting doing so. Three times as many were perceived to exaggerate qualifications on a resume than actually reported doing so. Four times as many were thought to be unfaithful to romantic partners than those reporting being unfaithful.

The report also shows undergraduates searching for the right balance between learning together and demonstrating their own ability. The number receiving unpermitted help rose nearly 20 percent over the past six years, and those working on an assignment with others when the instructor asked for individual work increased nearly 15 percent during the same period.

"The biggest point of frustration is wanting to work together but feeling bad about it and knowing that others are working together, and it's not really fair," one student said. Another highlighted the tension students feel on this issue, saying, "It shouldn't be taboo to call somebody out on integrity."

"That's why we're publicizing these results," said council member Noah Pickus, director of the Kenan Institute for Ethics. "Ethical behavior is the norm. Students shouldn't feel like they're different or odd because they act with integrity."

© 2013 Office of News & Communications
615 Chapel Drive, Box 90563, Durham, NC 27708-0563
(919) 684-2823; After-hours phone (for reporters on deadline): (919) 812-6603