Being Born in Lean Times Is Bad News for Baboons

Famine has long-term effects on female fertility

Baboons born in times of famine are more vulnerable to food shortages later in life, finds a new study. Photo courtesy of Susan Alberts, Duke University.

The saying ”what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger” may not hold up to scientific scrutiny. Baboons born in times of famine are more vulnerable to food shortages later in life, finds a new study. The findings are important because they help explain why people who are malnourished in early childhood often experience poor health as adults.After the plains of southern Kenya experienced a severe drought in 2009 that took a terrible toll on wildlife, researchers at Duke and Princeton Universities looked at how 50 wild baboons coped with the drought, and whether the conditions they faced in infancy played a role.The semi-arid savanna of southern Kenya usually receives an average of 14 inches of rain a year -- akin to much of Nebraska or Kansas. But in 2009 it fell to five inches, less than the Mojave Desert receives. The year before wasn’t much better -- rainfall in 2008 dropped to half of normal levels. The grasslands the animals depend on for food dried up and watering holes disappeared, leaving many animals starving or weak from hunger.“We lost 98 percent of the wildebeest population, 75 percent of the zebra population and 30 percent of the elephant population,” said co-author Susan Alberts, a biology professor at Duke. ”It was impossible to go anywhere without smelling death.”Most baboons made it, but the drought left them underweight and many females stopped ovulating. In a forthcoming paper in the journal American Naturalist, the researchers compared two groups of females -- one group born during low rainfall years and the other born during normal rainfall years. All females in the study were adults by time of the 2009 drought, but those born in lean times fared worse in 2009 than those born in times of plenty, the researchers found.

After the plains of southern Kenya experienced a severe drought in 2009 that took a terrible toll on wildlife, researchers at Duke University and Princeton University looked at how 50 wild baboons coped with the drought, and whether the conditions they faced in infancy played a role. Photo courtesy of Susan Alberts.

During the 2009 drought, baboons born during low rainfall years were 60 percent less likely to become pregnant, whereas pregnancy rates dipped by only 10 percent for females born during normal rainfall years.Drought babies born to higher-status mothers were less affected by the 2009 event.“It might be that baboons born to higher-ranked moms have better access to food, or suffer lower levels of social stress,” Alberts said.|The findings help explain why people who are malnourished in early childhood go on to have higher rates of obesity, diabetes and heart disease as adults.Some researchers argue that human babies conceived or born in lean times are programmed for food shortages later in life. They develop a “thrifty metabolism,” aimed at storing fat and conserving energy in order to survive starvation. Things go awry, the thinking goes, only when the environments they experienced as infants and as adults don't match, such as when a child conceived in famine grows up and eats an excess of Big Gulps and double cheeseburgers, said study co-author Amanda Lea, a graduate student in biology at Duke.But the baboon fertility study lends support to another idea, namely that kids who don’t get enough to eat during their first year of life are simply less resilient as adults than their counterparts. “The data suggest that early adversity carries lifelong costs,” said co-author Jenny Tung, an assistant professor of evolutionary anthropology at Duke.“It’s bad to be born in bad times, but with the right social or economic environment, that can be mitigated,” Alberts added.Jeanne Altmann of Princeton was also an author of this study. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (DGE 1160401, BCS 0323553, DEB 0846286, IOS 0919200), the National Institute on Aging (R01AG034513, P01AG031719, P30AG034424, P30AG024361), and grants from Duke University, Princeton University, and the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.