Choose the topics of most interest to you to follow under "My Headlines".
Candidate Debates Have Only Small, Temporary Impact, Political Scientist Says
Editor's Note: Duke provides an on-campus satellite uplink facility for live or pre-recorded television interviews. We are also equipped with ISDN connectivity for radio interviews. Broadcast reporters should contact Scott Wells at (919) 660-1741 or James Todd at (919) 681-8061 to arrange an interview.
As polls show Mitt Romney gaining on Barack Obama after last week's debate, and with the vice presidential candidates squaring off this week, a Duke political science professor discusses the importance of debates.
Professor of political science, economics and public policy, Duke University
http://www.duke.edu/~munger/ (personal website)
Specializes in congressional-presidential elections. Libertarian candidate for N.C. governor in 2008.
"Debates don't matter, except that the results contribute to a media narrative. Reagan was old and confused, until he zinged Mondale with that 'I refuse to make age an issue. I will not use my opponent's youth and experience against him!' line. After that, Reagan quickly became 'the Great Communicator.' Both views, the confused view and the Great Communicator view, were actually caricatures. But the prevailing narrative can sometimes matter, and debates can sometimes affect the prevailing narrative.
"But the statistical evidence strongly suggests that the debates have only a small effect, and even that is temporary. And vice presidential debates don't matter, on stilts!"
© 2013 Office of News & Communications
615 Chapel Drive, Box 90563, Durham, NC 27708-0563
(919) 684-2823; After-hours phone (for reporters on deadline): (919) 812-6603